summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-76-gcc-noexcept.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'www-client/chromium/files/chromium-76-gcc-noexcept.patch')
-rw-r--r--www-client/chromium/files/chromium-76-gcc-noexcept.patch347
1 files changed, 347 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-76-gcc-noexcept.patch b/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-76-gcc-noexcept.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2a7f4b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/www-client/chromium/files/chromium-76-gcc-noexcept.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
+From 84c91abab33966f928497c24db4a39f436d2dca8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jose Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:50:11 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Make SharedMemoryMapping move constructor noexcept
+
+As LayerTreeHostImpl::UIResourceData move constructor is declared
+noexcept with default implementation, the move constructor of its
+members should also be noexcept. GCC will fail to build otherwise
+for mismatching noexcept declaration.
+
+We also set the move assignment operator.
+
+Bug: 819294
+Change-Id: Icd663da83b882e15f7d16780c9241972e09bc492
+Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1645297
+Commit-Queue: José Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Reviewed-by: Daniel Cheng <dcheng@chromium.org>
+Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#667064}
+---
+
+diff --git a/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.cc b/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.cc
+index 2be2570..8426fa8 100644
+--- a/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.cc
++++ b/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.cc
+@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
+
+ SharedMemoryMapping::SharedMemoryMapping() = default;
+
+-SharedMemoryMapping::SharedMemoryMapping(SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping)
++SharedMemoryMapping::SharedMemoryMapping(SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping) noexcept
+ : memory_(mapping.memory_),
+ size_(mapping.size_),
+ mapped_size_(mapping.mapped_size_),
+@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
+ }
+
+ SharedMemoryMapping& SharedMemoryMapping::operator=(
+- SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping) {
++ SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping) noexcept {
+ Unmap();
+ memory_ = mapping.memory_;
+ size_ = mapping.size_;
+@@ -90,9 +90,9 @@
+
+ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping::ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping() = default;
+ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping::ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping(
+- ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&) = default;
++ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept = default;
+ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping& ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping::operator=(
+- ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&) = default;
++ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept = default;
+ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping::ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping(
+ void* address,
+ size_t size,
+@@ -102,9 +102,9 @@
+
+ WritableSharedMemoryMapping::WritableSharedMemoryMapping() = default;
+ WritableSharedMemoryMapping::WritableSharedMemoryMapping(
+- WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&) = default;
++ WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept = default;
+ WritableSharedMemoryMapping& WritableSharedMemoryMapping::operator=(
+- WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&) = default;
++ WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept = default;
+ WritableSharedMemoryMapping::WritableSharedMemoryMapping(
+ void* address,
+ size_t size,
+diff --git a/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.h b/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.h
+index d9569af..2b8858e 100644
+--- a/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.h
++++ b/base/memory/shared_memory_mapping.h
+@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
+ SharedMemoryMapping();
+
+ // Move operations are allowed.
+- SharedMemoryMapping(SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping);
+- SharedMemoryMapping& operator=(SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping);
++ SharedMemoryMapping(SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping) noexcept;
++ SharedMemoryMapping& operator=(SharedMemoryMapping&& mapping) noexcept;
+
+ // Unmaps the region if the mapping is valid.
+ virtual ~SharedMemoryMapping();
+@@ -93,8 +93,9 @@
+ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping();
+
+ // Move operations are allowed.
+- ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping(ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&);
+- ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping& operator=(ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&);
++ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping(ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept;
++ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping& operator=(
++ ReadOnlySharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept;
+
+ // Returns the base address of the mapping. This is read-only memory. This is
+ // page-aligned. This is nullptr for invalid instances.
+@@ -171,8 +172,9 @@
+ WritableSharedMemoryMapping();
+
+ // Move operations are allowed.
+- WritableSharedMemoryMapping(WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&);
+- WritableSharedMemoryMapping& operator=(WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&);
++ WritableSharedMemoryMapping(WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept;
++ WritableSharedMemoryMapping& operator=(
++ WritableSharedMemoryMapping&&) noexcept;
+
+ // Returns the base address of the mapping. This is writable memory. This is
+ // page-aligned. This is nullptr for invalid instances.
+
+From bdc24128b75008743d819e298557a53205706e7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jose Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:22:25 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] GCC: fix noexcept from move constructor and assign operators of AccountInfo
+
+AccountInfo declares them as noexcept and uses default implementation,
+so all its members (including AccountId) should be noexcept. But AccountId
+is not noexcept. To fix it we just need to make CoreAccountId move
+operator/assign operator noexcept.
+
+Bug: 819294
+Change-Id: Ice38654ab7cf3b9eaa6f54aa36e1fec329264f98
+Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1645296
+Reviewed-by: Roger Tawa <rogerta@chromium.org>
+Reviewed-by: Sylvain Defresne <sdefresne@chromium.org>
+Commit-Queue: José Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#667484}
+---
+
+diff --git a/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.cc b/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.cc
+index d808082..12eefe3 100644
+--- a/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.cc
++++ b/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.cc
+@@ -6,8 +6,16 @@
+
+ CoreAccountId::CoreAccountId() = default;
+
++CoreAccountId::CoreAccountId(const CoreAccountId&) = default;
++
++CoreAccountId::CoreAccountId(CoreAccountId&&) noexcept = default;
++
+ CoreAccountId::~CoreAccountId() = default;
+
++CoreAccountId& CoreAccountId::operator=(const CoreAccountId&) = default;
++
++CoreAccountId& CoreAccountId::operator=(CoreAccountId&&) noexcept = default;
++
+ CoreAccountId::CoreAccountId(const char* id) : id(id) {}
+
+ CoreAccountId::CoreAccountId(std::string&& id) : id(std::move(id)) {}
+diff --git a/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.h b/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.h
+index 5ea602a..c2d1911 100644
+--- a/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.h
++++ b/google_apis/gaia/core_account_id.h
+@@ -14,8 +14,13 @@
+ // for design and tracking).
+ struct CoreAccountId {
+ CoreAccountId();
++ CoreAccountId(const CoreAccountId&);
++ CoreAccountId(CoreAccountId&&) noexcept;
+ ~CoreAccountId();
+
++ CoreAccountId& operator=(const CoreAccountId&);
++ CoreAccountId& operator=(CoreAccountId&&) noexcept;
++
+ // Those implicit constructor and conversion operator allow to
+ // progressively migrate the code to use this struct. Removing
+ // them is tracked by https://crbug.com/959161
+
+From 9aae68736bc7eb7172d0d0c978ecb6d1f75c7b30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jose Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:27:19 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] GCC: add noexcept move assignment in history::URLRow
+
+In GCC, build is failing because history::QueryURLResult declares its move
+assignment operator as noexcept using default implementation. That requires
+its members to provide a move assignment operator that is noexcept too.
+
+But URLRow was missing noexcept declaration in move assignment operator (even
+though it was providing noexcept to its move constructor).
+
+Bug: 819294
+Change-Id: I726e3cf7a4a50c9206a5d0fba8a561d363483d4f
+---
+
+diff --git a/components/history/core/browser/url_row.cc b/components/history/core/browser/url_row.cc
+index 44c22fd..aec0101 100644
+--- a/components/history/core/browser/url_row.cc
++++ b/components/history/core/browser/url_row.cc
+@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
+ }
+
+ URLRow& URLRow::operator=(const URLRow& other) = default;
+-URLRow& URLRow::operator=(URLRow&& other) = default;
++URLRow& URLRow::operator=(URLRow&& other) noexcept = default;
+
+ void URLRow::Swap(URLRow* other) {
+ std::swap(id_, other->id_);
+diff --git a/components/history/core/browser/url_row.h b/components/history/core/browser/url_row.h
+index 8f6f9cf..31a1ef8 100644
+--- a/components/history/core/browser/url_row.h
++++ b/components/history/core/browser/url_row.h
+@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
+
+ virtual ~URLRow();
+ URLRow& operator=(const URLRow& other);
+- URLRow& operator=(URLRow&& other);
++ URLRow& operator=(URLRow&& other) noexcept;
+
+ URLID id() const { return id_; }
+
+
+From 41d954dec0669c9a85730c0bde7df7ba7a0ff43e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jose Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 15:30:49 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix AutocompleteMatch move constructor/assign operator noexcept
+
+For AutocompleteMatch to declare noexcept them, all the contained
+properties need to be noexcept too. This is required at least
+for SuggestionAnswer, because base::string16 will make default
+calculated signature of the move operator noexcept(false).
+
+To avoid this issue we explicitely declare them on SuggestionAnswer,
+and its member classes TextField and ImageLine.
+
+Bug: 819294
+Change-Id: I8714f2c6352a3292bdebdc3aed9790270e49c580
+Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1554669
+Reviewed-by: Kevin Bailey <krb@chromium.org>
+Commit-Queue: José Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#666714}
+---
+
+diff --git a/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.cc b/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.cc
+index 151e55f..a0c9049 100644
+--- a/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.cc
++++ b/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.cc
+@@ -55,6 +55,12 @@
+
+ SuggestionAnswer::TextField::TextField() = default;
+ SuggestionAnswer::TextField::~TextField() = default;
++SuggestionAnswer::TextField::TextField(const TextField&) = default;
++SuggestionAnswer::TextField::TextField(TextField&&) noexcept = default;
++SuggestionAnswer::TextField& SuggestionAnswer::TextField::operator=(
++ const TextField&) = default;
++SuggestionAnswer::TextField& SuggestionAnswer::TextField::operator=(
++ TextField&&) noexcept = default;
+
+ // static
+ bool SuggestionAnswer::TextField::ParseTextField(const base::Value& field_json,
+@@ -93,9 +99,12 @@
+ SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine::ImageLine()
+ : num_text_lines_(1) {}
+ SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine::ImageLine(const ImageLine& line) = default;
++SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine::ImageLine(ImageLine&&) noexcept = default;
+
+ SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine& SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine::operator=(
+ const ImageLine& line) = default;
++SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine& SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine::operator=(
++ ImageLine&&) noexcept = default;
+
+ SuggestionAnswer::ImageLine::~ImageLine() {}
+
+@@ -251,9 +260,14 @@
+
+ SuggestionAnswer::SuggestionAnswer(const SuggestionAnswer& answer) = default;
+
++SuggestionAnswer::SuggestionAnswer(SuggestionAnswer&&) noexcept = default;
++
+ SuggestionAnswer& SuggestionAnswer::operator=(const SuggestionAnswer& answer) =
+ default;
+
++SuggestionAnswer& SuggestionAnswer::operator=(SuggestionAnswer&&) noexcept =
++ default;
++
+ SuggestionAnswer::~SuggestionAnswer() = default;
+
+ // static
+diff --git a/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.h b/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.h
+index 31be937..2840ace 100644
+--- a/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.h
++++ b/components/omnibox/browser/suggestion_answer.h
+@@ -125,6 +125,10 @@
+ public:
+ TextField();
+ ~TextField();
++ TextField(const TextField&);
++ TextField(TextField&&) noexcept;
++ TextField& operator=(const TextField&);
++ TextField& operator=(TextField&&) noexcept;
+
+ // Parses |field_json| dictionary and populates |text_field| with the
+ // contents. If any of the required elements is missing, returns false and
+@@ -162,7 +166,9 @@
+ public:
+ ImageLine();
+ explicit ImageLine(const ImageLine& line);
++ ImageLine(ImageLine&&) noexcept;
+ ImageLine& operator=(const ImageLine& line);
++ ImageLine& operator=(ImageLine&&) noexcept;
+ ~ImageLine();
+
+ // Parses dictionary |line_json| and populates |image_line| with the
+@@ -213,7 +219,9 @@
+
+ SuggestionAnswer();
+ SuggestionAnswer(const SuggestionAnswer& answer);
++ SuggestionAnswer(SuggestionAnswer&&) noexcept;
+ SuggestionAnswer& operator=(const SuggestionAnswer& answer);
++ SuggestionAnswer& operator=(SuggestionAnswer&&) noexcept;
+ ~SuggestionAnswer();
+
+ // Parses dictionary |answer_json| and fills a SuggestionAnswer containing the
+
+From 9f99af41cae3cfff3bcdcc856c1539801c9b745b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jose Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:59:59 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] DisjoingRangeLockManager::Lock move constructor/assign operator cannot be noexcept
+
+They depend on LockRequest, that depends on WeakPtr, none of them noexcept.
+
+Bug: 819294
+Change-Id: I04ec15901ca627358df727540597f21f135c129b
+Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1646252
+Reviewed-by: Joshua Bell <jsbell@chromium.org>
+Commit-Queue: José Dapena Paz <jose.dapena@lge.com>
+Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#667260}
+---
+
+diff --git a/content/browser/indexed_db/scopes/disjoint_range_lock_manager.cc b/content/browser/indexed_db/scopes/disjoint_range_lock_manager.cc
+index 478a5c9..a18c6cd 100644
+--- a/content/browser/indexed_db/scopes/disjoint_range_lock_manager.cc
++++ b/content/browser/indexed_db/scopes/disjoint_range_lock_manager.cc
+@@ -19,14 +19,13 @@
+ : requested_type(type),
+ locks_holder(std::move(locks_holder)),
+ acquired_callback(std::move(acquired_callback)) {}
+-DisjointRangeLockManager::LockRequest::LockRequest(LockRequest&&) noexcept =
+- default;
++DisjointRangeLockManager::LockRequest::LockRequest(LockRequest&&) = default;
+ DisjointRangeLockManager::LockRequest::~LockRequest() = default;
+ DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock::Lock() = default;
+-DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock::Lock(Lock&&) noexcept = default;
++DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock::Lock(Lock&&) = default;
+ DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock::~Lock() = default;
+ DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock& DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock::operator=(
+- DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock&&) noexcept = default;
++ DisjointRangeLockManager::Lock&&) = default;
+
+ DisjointRangeLockManager::DisjointRangeLockManager(int level_count)
+ : task_runner_(base::SequencedTaskRunnerHandle::Get()),